Inflation took an unexpected dip in March, a pleasant surprise amid the concerns about President Trump’s global tariffs, which many feared would ignite price increases while also slowing economic growth.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by 2.4% compared to the previous year, a significant slowdown from February’s 2.8% increase, marking the slowest annual rise since September. Over the month, prices actually decreased by 0.1%.
Additionally, core inflation—which excludes volatile food and energy prices—saw a decline to 2.8% in March, after a marginal monthly increase of 0.1%.
The report, issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Thursday, fell short of economists’ expectations and was compiled before most of Trump’s tariffs were enacted. Recently, the president’s plans have shifted sharply, with a major announcement on Wednesday of a 90-day pause on new tariffs that had been set from April 2.
Trump opted for the pause as global financial markets showed instability and raised concerns about investor confidence in U.S. assets. Now, imports from most countries face a 10% tariff, while goods from China bear a 125% tariff, following China’s retaliatory actions against U.S. products.
Trump’s policy pivot significantly alleviated concerns about the economic impact of these trade policies. However, economists warn that the existing tariffs will still incur costs, potentially slowing growth and driving up inflation.
For the Federal Reserve, the critical issue is managing these risks as they consider interest rate decisions. Prior to Trump’s tariffs, inflation was stubbornly high, complicating the Fed’s progress toward its 2% target, which had already made them cautious about further interest rate cuts after last year’s series of reductions—caution only heightened by the new tariffs.
With inflation likely to pick up again, even temporarily, the Fed has set a high threshold for further rate reductions, requiring clear signs of a weakening economy.
A major concern for the central bank is if future inflation expectations shift, suggesting Americans might fear persistently high prices. Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell emphasized the institution’s duty to manage inflation expectations and ensure that one-time price level increases don’t evolve into ongoing inflation issues.
To date, only a few survey-based measures, like one from the University of Michigan, have changed significantly, while market-based measures remain largely stable. Yet, economist Ricardo Reis from the London School of Economics noted the size and prominence of the inflation shock and the mixed messages from expectations data.
“The Fed has an inflation target to hit, and tariffs have a direct and likely swift impact on inflation,” Reis stated. “They need to communicate a tough stance.”