Senator Cory Booker made headlines Tuesday night as he surpassed Strom Thurmond’s long-standing record for the longest Senate speech. This extraordinary show of resilience and determination was framed as a call to action against the Trump administration.
The New Jersey Democrat, former presidential contender, began speaking at 7 p.m. on Monday. Booker declared he would continue to speak as long as he could physically manage. His impassioned speech continued well into Tuesday, fiercely criticizing Trump’s budget cuts and stringent immigration policies.
At precisely 7:19 p.m., 24 hours and 19 minutes into his speech, Booker broke Thurmond’s 1957 filibuster record against a civil-rights bill. Despite reaching this milestone, Booker joked about addressing “some biological urgencies” soon.
Cheers erupted in the Senate chamber when Booker surpassed Thurmond’s record. Booker took a moment to acknowledge his predecessor with these words: “To despise him is wrong. My motive was perhaps too driven by ego—to break the record of a man who tried to stop the rights I now defend. Yet, I’m here not because of his speech, but in spite of it, because the voice of the people proved stronger.”
Earlier in the day, at 4:20 p.m., Booker had already surpassed Senator Ted Cruz’s 21-hour and 19-minute protest against Obama’s Affordable Care Act in 2013. As Booker’s speech extended into Tuesday, thousands tuned in via livestream, intrigued to witness how long he would continue.
Without a single bathroom break, Booker’s speech was punctuated by supportive questions from Democratic colleagues. He frequently referenced his notes and waved a tiny U.S. Constitution as he gesticulated energetically, though his voice grew hoarser as he pushed on.
In highlighting the nation’s “moral moment,” Booker argued that the Trump administration’s actions had plunged the U.S. into a “crisis” barely two months after Trump’s entry into office. “My voice may be inadequate,” Booker confessed, “but together, we the people hold true power.”
Over 67 years ago, Thurmond famously spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes to impede a civil-rights bill. Although the historical records don’t stretch back to the earliest American speeches, Thurmond’s stands as the longest recorded.
Weeks of contemplation led Booker to this marathon address, driven by the desire to dethrone Thurmond, a former segregationist from South Carolina. Unlike Thurmond’s performance, Booker’s speech was not a filibuster since it did not stall any specific legislative proceedings. However, it did delay a planned vote on a Democratic proposal to repeal Trump’s Canadian tariffs.
Occasionally, Booker welcomed probing questions from his peers and paused for a prayer led by the Senate’s chaplain. His agenda-focused speech covered health care, education, immigration, and national security concerns.
He vocally opposed Trump’s perceived plans to cut Medicaid and similar programs—a claim the White House has denied, though the administration has criticized Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security for alleged misuse and inefficiencies.
Booker frequently drew from American history, equating the current political climate to significant past struggles such as the civil-rights movement and the suffrage battle. He referenced luminaries like John Lewis and John McCain and spent 30 minutes recounting a Canadian citizen’s ordeal with U.S. immigration officials.
“In this democracy, the power of the people supersedes those in authority,” Booker asserted, emphasizing that movements like civil rights were not won by the actions of a few but the collective strength of many.
He appealed to a diverse coalition to resist the current administration’s policies.
The White House dismissed Booker’s oration, with spokesman Harrison Fields comparing it to Booker’s “Spartacus” moment during Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court hearings—a move mocked as seeking viral attention.
Fields quipped in a statement, “When will he realize he’s not Spartacus—he’s a spoof?”
Yet, in the Capitol, Booker’s marathon defense was met with applause from colleagues and staff alike. Senator Chuck Schumer, Democratic minority leader, praised Booker for his “tour de force” remarks.
“It’s not just the duration but the compelling narrative of your indictment of this detrimental administration,” Schumer remarked, appreciating Booker’s stamina and strength.
As Democratic peers posed questions—less interrogative than supportive—Booker’s team hustled to refresh his supplies. Tissue for perspiration differed from a replenished notebook filled with his points.
The House representatives, drawn by the unfolding spectacle, came and went, bearing witness to Booker’s endurance.
Booker framed his speech as reaching beyond routine politics, calling it a crucial appeal to justice.
“This is not about partisanship,” Booker clarified. “This is a moral crossroads. Where do you stand?”
Contributions by Maya C. Miller and Robert Jimison